Smith v. Hinojosa
Plaintiff / Appellee: Margaret Mary Smith
Defendant / Appellant: Gage Matthew Hinojosa
Case Number: 22-40643
Filed: September 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-235. Electronic ROA due on 12/05/2022. [22-40643] (ABT) [Entered: 11/18/2022 09:53 AM]
November 18, 2022 TRANSCRIPT FILED IN DISTRICT COURT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Frances Carbia, Dt. Filed in Dist. Ct: 11/10/2022 Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date canceled [22-40643] (ABT) [Entered: 11/18/2022 09:52 AM]
October 6, 2022 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Gage Matthew Hinojosa. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Frances Carbia, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 08/09/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 10/17/2022 for Frances Carbia, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9955175-2 ] [22-40643] (PAC) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:37 AM]
October 6, 2022 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Frances Carbia, Est. Completion Dt: 11/07/2022, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 10/06/2022, Dt. Trans. to be Filed: 11/07/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Motion Hearing 08/09/2022. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 11/07/2022 for Frances Carbia, Court Reporter [22-40643] (PAC) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:38 AM]
October 6, 2022 COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from frenchie carbia. [22-40643] (Frances Carbia ) [Entered: 10/06/2022 09:56 AM]
October 5, 2022 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Gage Matthew Hinojosa (motion hearing on Aug. 9, 2022, before District Court) for the Court to process. Date of service: 10/05/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Manning; Attorney for Appellant: Miller. [22-40643] (Brian Miller ) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:44 PM]
October 4, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Brian Miller for Mr. Gage Matthew Hinojosa for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40643] (Brian Miller ) [Entered: 10/04/2022 09:49 AM]
October 4, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Brian Miller for Appellant Gage Matthew Hinojosa in 22-40643 [22-40643] (SDH) [Entered: 10/04/2022 03:30 PM]
October 3, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9952842-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 10/18/2022 for Appellant Gage Matthew Hinojosa [22-40643] (SDH) [Entered: 10/03/2022 03:32 PM]
September 28, 2022 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gage Matthew Hinojosa [22-40643] (ABT) [Entered: 09/28/2022 04:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Smith v. Hinojosa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Margaret Mary Smith
Represented By: Matthew S. Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Gage Matthew Hinojosa
Represented By: Brian Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?