Rodriguez v. Touhami
| Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr. |
| Mohamad Touhami, John Doe One, John Doe Two, John Doe Three, Joe Collins and Frank Rigsby |
| 22-40695 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting in part, the motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr. [ # 10001625-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 01/04/2023 for Appellant Frank W. Rodriguez Jr. [22-40695] (DLM) [Entered: 12/13/2022 02:52 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr. to extend time to file brief as appellant until 02/03/2023 [10001625-2]. Date of service: 11/24/2022 [22-40695] (DLM) [Entered: 12/12/2022 04:15 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40695] (MRW) [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:25 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9968767-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-40695] (RLL) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:57 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. /Pet's Brief due on 12/05/2022 for Appellant Frank W. Rodriguez Jr. [22-40695] (RLL) [Entered: 10/25/2022 02:59 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 9:20-CV-140. Electronic ROA due on 11/09/2022. [22-40695] (RLL) [Entered: 10/25/2022 03:06 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Frank W. Rodriguez, Jr. [22-40695] (DLJ) [Entered: 10/20/2022 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
