Bonner v. Pearcy

Plaintiff / Appellant: Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Defendant / Appellee: Brian A. Pearcy, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, J. Melancon, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department, Jack Roady, Galveston County Criminal District Attorney and C. D. Simmons, Supervisor, City of Galveston Police Department
Case Number: 22-40757
Filed: November 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 27, 2023 Bonner v. Pearcy

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2023 Filing 17 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40757] (RLL) [Entered: 01/05/2023 03:42 PM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 16 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:19-CV-274. Electronic ROA due on 01/05/2023. [22-40757] (CCR) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:06 PM]
December 20, 2022 Filing 15 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9 ]Brief in Support deadline satisfied. Date of Service: 12/13/2022. [15] [22-40757] (CCR) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:05 PM]
December 20, 2022 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner in support of the Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner in 22-40757 [ # 9 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [22-40757] (CCR) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:00 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 13 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the copy of the motion to proceed IFP filed with the district court received from Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner because it is not necessary. We have however, removed the trust fund statement and appended to the motion for IFP filed in this court, but he still needs to also complete and return the enclosed MISC 14 form. [22-40757] (DLM) [Entered: 12/09/2022 04:23 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. [22-40757] (DLM) [Entered: 12/09/2022 04:10 PM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9] Affidavit due on 12/19/2022 for Appellant Ryan Rydell Bonner. Brief in Support deadline updated to 12/19/2022 for Ryan Rydell Bonner.. Date of service: 11/23/2022 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: Needs an inmate trust fund statement and brief in support. [22-40757] (DLM) [Entered: 12/07/2022 10:16 AM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 8 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [22-40757] (DLM) [Entered: 12/07/2022 08:36 AM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or motion for in forma pauperis (IFP) filed in Fifth Circuit due on 01/03/2023, for Appellant Ryan Rydell Bonner. [22-40757] (DLJ) [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:31 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 5 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 11/22/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. [22-40757] (DLJ) [Entered: 12/01/2022 04:25 PM]
November 22, 2022 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Rydell Bonner [22-40757] (CCR) [Entered: 11/22/2022 02:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bonner v. Pearcy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Ryan Rydell Bonner, also known as Pookie
Represented By: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Brian A. Pearcy, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. Melancon, Law Enforcement, City of Galveston Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jack Roady, Galveston County Criminal District Attorney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: C. D. Simmons, Supervisor, City of Galveston Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?