Chapoy v. Union Pacific Railroad
James Chapoy |
Union Pacific Railroad, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Southern Pacific Transportation Company |
22-40791 |
December 7, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Asbestos personal Injury-Prod. Liab |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellant Mr. James Chapoy. Extension Granted to and including 02/15/2023. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 02/15/2023 for Appellant James Chapoy [22-40791] (CCR) [Entered: 01/25/2023 04:21 PM] |
Filing 18 UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Mr. James Chapoy for filing Appellant's Opening Brief until 02/15/2023 [22-40791] (Earl Landers Vickery ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 03:09 PM] |
Filing 16 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 02/01/2023 for Appellant James Chapoy. [22-40791] (DDL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:14 PM] |
Filing 15 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-40791] (DDL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:14 PM] |
Filing 14 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Gregory S. Hudson for Appellee Union Pacific Railroad in 22-40791 [22-40791] (CCR) [Entered: 12/22/2022 02:54 PM] |
Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40791] (Gregory S. Hudson ) [Entered: 12/21/2022 08:50 AM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Earl Landers Vickery for Appellant James Chapoy in 22-40791 [22-40791] (CCR) [Entered: 12/20/2022 02:01 PM] |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-169. Electronic ROA due on 01/03/2023. [22-40791] (CCR) [Entered: 12/19/2022 04:02 PM] |
Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. James Chapoy advising transcript unnecessary Date of Service: 12/19/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Hudson; Attorney for Appellants: Vickery, Vickery [22-40791] (Earl Landers Vickery ) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:51 PM] |
Filing 8 Attorney Earl Landers Vickery added as counsel of record for Appellant James Chapoy in 22-40791 [22-40791] (NFD) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:48 PM] |
Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-40791] (Earl Landers Vickery ) [Entered: 12/19/2022 03:17 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 12/23/2022 for Appellant James Chapoy [22-40791] (NFD) [Entered: 12/08/2022 03:38 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. James Chapoy [22-40791] (SDH) [Entered: 12/07/2022 12:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Chapoy v. Union Pacific Railroad | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: James Chapoy | |
Represented By: | Arnold Anderson Vickery |
Represented By: | Earl Landers Vickery |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Union Pacific Railroad, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Southern Pacific Transportation Company | |
Represented By: | Gregory S. Hudson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.