USA v. Zavala
| United States of America |
| Jimmy Zavala |
| 22-50071 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence (2255) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala to vacate multiple dc orders and remand [9807823-2]. [22-50071] (MRW) [Entered: 03/28/2022 08:25 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50071] (DDL) [Entered: 03/23/2022 03:40 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER denying Motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala [ # 9802129-2 ] [22-50071] (MRW) [Entered: 03/21/2022 04:14 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending dc ruling on 59(e) motion. [22-50071] (MRW) [Entered: 03/21/2022 08:22 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/01/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala. [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/15/2022 05:52 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala to proceed in forma pauperis [9798904-2] Fee deadline canceled. [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/15/2022 05:54 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the transcript order forms, etc received from Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala because your request must be made to the district court [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/15/2022 05:26 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/01/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala.Motion due on 04/13/2022 for Appellant Jimmy Zavala. Brief in Support due on 04/13/2022 for Appellant Jimmy Zavala. Fee due on 04/13/2022 for Appellant Jimmy Zavala [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/04/2022 11:25 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:04-CR-425-2 5:21-CV-1237. Electronic ROA due on 03/21/2022. [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/04/2022 11:31 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Compel transcripts pursuant to FRAP 10 received from Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala because you can request a copy of the record and transcripts from the district court [22-50071] (MRW) [Entered: 03/07/2022 08:59 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9773144-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 02/24/2022 for Appellant Jimmy Zavala [22-50071] (RAJ) [Entered: 02/09/2022 03:02 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jimmy Zavala [22-50071] (MVM) [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Zavala | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jimmy Zavala | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy Zavala |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
