Nall v. Yee
Dustin Wayne Nall |
Dr. Benjamin Yee, Katherine Rediske, Rebecca McDow, Valencia Pollard-Fortson and Step 2 Medical Grievance Program Office of Professional Standards Division |
22-50099 |
February 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 03/08/2022 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Dustin Wayne Nall. Initial partial filing fee assessed.Fee deadline satisfied [22-50099] (MRW) [Entered: 04/01/2022 01:57 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 05/11/2022 for Appellant Dustin Wayne Nall. [22-50099] (MRW) [Entered: 04/01/2022 02:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jessica Lauren Weltge for Appellee Valencia Pollard-Fortson in 22-50099, Attorney Jessica Lauren Weltge for Appellee Rebecca McDow in 22-50099, Attorney Jessica Lauren Weltge for Appellee Katherine Rediske in 22-50099, Attorney Jessica Lauren Weltge for Appellee Benjamin Yee in 22-50099 [22-50099] (LEF) [Entered: 03/10/2022 04:49 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50099] (Jessica Lauren Weltge ) [Entered: 03/09/2022 04:41 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9780010-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/14/2022 for Appellant Dustin Wayne Nall [22-50099] (LEF) [Entered: 02/18/2022 11:39 AM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Dustin Wayne Nall [22-50099] (RSM) [Entered: 02/14/2022 08:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.