USA v. Torres Marrufo
| United States of America |
| Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo, also known as Jaguar, also known as Tonin, also known as Catorce, also known as 14, also known as Tono, also known as El Uno |
| 22-50189 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [22-50189] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/16/2022 04:34 PM] |
| DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo [22-50189] (RAJ) [Entered: 03/16/2022 04:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Torres Marrufo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Joseph H. Gay Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jose Antonio Torres Marrufo, also known as Jaguar, also known as Tonin, also known as Catorce, also known as 14, also known as Tono, also known as El Uno | |
| Represented By: | Art Werge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
