Evans v. NetSpend Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant: Delarick William Evans, Native American Global-Exchange, its Chief Executive Officer
Defendant / Appellee: NetSpend Corporation, in their individual/official capacity, CEO/President Antonio and NetSpend San Antonio
Case Number: 22-50310
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 26, 2022 Evans v. NetSpend Corporation

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50310] (MRW) [Entered: 06/09/2022 10:57 AM]
May 25, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:22-CV-28. Electronic ROA due on 06/09/2022. [22-50310] (MRW) [Entered: 05/25/2022 08:46 AM]
May 24, 2022 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Delarick William Evans to proceed in forma pauperis in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) [9854895-2] Fee deadline canceled. [22-50310] (MRW) [Entered: 05/25/2022 08:43 AM]
May 24, 2022 BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Delarick William Evans in support of Motion to proceed IFP in accordance with PLRA [ # 9854895-2 ]. [9854899-1] [22-50310] (MRW) [Entered: 05/25/2022 08:46 AM]
April 29, 2022 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 04/26/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Delarick William Evans because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case. [22-50310] (RSM) [Entered: 04/29/2022 12:49 PM]
April 29, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9835957-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 06/23/2022 for Appellant Delarick William Evans [22-50310] (RSM) [Entered: 04/29/2022 12:53 PM]
April 25, 2022 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Delarick William Evans [22-50310] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:49 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Evans v. NetSpend Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Delarick William Evans, Native American Global-Exchange, its Chief Executive Officer
Represented By: Delarick William Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NetSpend Corporation, in their individual/official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CEO/President Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NetSpend San Antonio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?