LULAC Texas v. Hughes
| LULAC Texas, Vote Latino, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans, Texas AFT and United States of America |
| Senator Bryan Hughes, Senator Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Texas Representative and Andrew Murr, Texas Representative |
| 22-50435 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Voting (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PAPER COPIES REQUESTED for the Appellee Brief filed by Appellee USA in 22-50435 [ # 9895048-2 ]. Paper Copies of Brief due on 07/27/2022 for Appellee United States of America. [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 07/22/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Paper copies of Appellee Brief filed by Appellees Texas Alliance for Retired Americans, LULAC Texas, Vote Latino and Texas AFT in 22-50435 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 07/22/2022 03:32 PM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED by USA. Date of service: 07/18/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Backer, Dodge, Hardin, Hawley, Nkwonta, Philo, Robin-Vergeer; Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson [22-50435] (Jonathan Backer ) [Entered: 07/18/2022 06:05 PM] |
| APPELLEE'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 E/Res's Brief deadline satisfied [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLEE'S MEMORANDUM BRIEF FILED by LULAC Texas, Texas AFT, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and Vote Latino. Date of service: 07/18/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Backer, Dodge, Hardin, Hawley, Nkwonta, Philo, Robin-Vergeer; Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson [22-50435] (Uzoma Nkem Nkwonta ) [Entered: 07/18/2022 09:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50435] (Alisa Philo ) [Entered: 07/12/2022 02:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Alisa Philo for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (LLL) [Entered: 07/12/2022 03:51 PM] |
| Paper copies of Record Excerpts filed by Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Bryan Hughes, Mr. Briscoe Cain and Mr. Andrew Murr in 22-50435 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 4. Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due deadline satisfied. [22-50435] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/27/2022 01:00 PM] |
| Paper copies of Appellant Brief filed by Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Bryan Hughes, Mr. Briscoe Cain and Mr. Andrew Murr in 22-50435 received. Paper copies match electronic version of document? Yes # of Copies Provided: 7. Paper Copies of Brief due deadline satisfied. [22-50435] (RAJ) [Entered: 06/27/2022 12:55 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Christopher D. Dodge for party(s) Appellee LULAC Texas Appellee Texas AFT Appellee Texas Alliance for Retired Americans Appellee Vote Latino, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:49 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Paper Copies of Brief due on 06/27/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr. [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Briscoe Cain, Mr. Bryan Hughes and Mr. Andrew Murr. Date of service: 06/21/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Backer, Dodge, Hardin, Hawley, Nkwonta, Robin-Vergeer; Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson [22-50435] (Lanora Christine Pettit ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 06:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50435] (Christopher D. Dodge ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 03:13 PM] |
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Paper Copies of Record Excerpts due on 06/27/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr. [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Briscoe Cain, Mr. Bryan Hughes and Mr. Andrew Murr. Date of service: 06/21/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Backer, Dodge, Hardin, Hawley, Nkwonta, Robin-Vergeer; Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson [22-50435] (Lanora Christine Pettit ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 06:37 PM] |
| CASE CALENDARED for oral argument on Tuesday, 08/02/2022 in New Orleans in the West Courtroom -- AM session. In accordance with our policy, lead counsel only will receive via email at a later date a copy of the court's docket and an acknowledgment form. All other counsel of record should monitor the court's website for the posting of the oral argument calendars.. [22-50435] (KMP) [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:48 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50435] (CMB) [Entered: 06/13/2022 09:26 AM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Briscoe Cain, Mr. Bryan Hughes and Mr. Andrew Murr. Fee deadline satisfied [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/09/2022 01:00 PM] |
| CASE TENTATIVELY calendared for oral argument for the week of 08/01/2022. [22-50435] (GAM) [Entered: 06/09/2022 04:12 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. EXPEDITED SCHEDULE. A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/21/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr. Appellee's Brief due on 07/18/2022 for Appellees LULAC Texas, Texas AFT, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans, United States of America and Vote Latino. Reply Brief due on 07/27/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr. [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:56 AM] |
| EXPEDITED ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:21-CV-844 and 1:21-CV-786. Electronic ROA due on 06/10/2022. [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:39 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Appellee USA added to case. Reason: Requested to be a party. Consent by appellants. [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:15 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bonnie Ilene Robin-Vergeer for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:25 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jonathan Backer for Appellee USA in 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:27 AM] |
| COURT ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Appellees' unopposed motion to expedite the appeal is GRANTED. [ # 9864763-2 ] [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 11:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Uzoma Nkem Nkwonta for party(s) Appellee LULAC Texas Appellee Texas AFT Appellee Texas Alliance for Retired Americans Appellee Vote Latino, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/07/2022 04:59 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50435] (Uzoma Nkem Nkwonta ) [Entered: 06/07/2022 09:09 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION to expedite the appeal [9864763-2]. Date of service: 06/07/2022 [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellees LULAC Texas, Texas AFT, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and Vote Latino to expedite the appeal [9864763-2]. Date of service: 06/07/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson; Attorney for Appellees: Hardin, Hawley, Nkwonta [22-50435] (Uzoma Nkem Nkwonta ) [Entered: 06/07/2022 08:35 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50435] (Bonnie Ilene Robin-Vergeer ) [Entered: 06/06/2022 12:29 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50435] (Jonathan Backer ) [Entered: 06/06/2022 12:03 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-50435] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Briscoe Cain, Mr. Bryan Hughes and Mr. Andrew Murr advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 06/03/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Cole, Pettit, Sweeten, Thompson; Attorney for Appellees: Hardin, Hawley [22-50435] (Patrick K. Sweeten ) [Entered: 06/03/2022 05:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Lanora Christine Pettit for party(s) Appellant Bryan Hughes Appellant Paul Bettencourt Appellant Briscoe Cain Appellant Andrew Murr, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 01:16 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) William Francis Cole for party(s) Appellant Bryan Hughes Appellant Paul Bettencourt Appellant Briscoe Cain Appellant Andrew Murr, in case 22-50435 [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 06/02/2022 01:11 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9858023-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 06/15/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr. Transcript order due on 06/15/2022 for Appellants Paul Bettencourt, Briscoe Cain, Bryan Hughes and Andrew Murr [22-50435] (CAS) [Entered: 05/31/2022 09:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50435] (Lanora Christine Pettit ) [Entered: 05/31/2022 03:50 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50435] (William Francis Cole ) [Entered: 05/31/2022 03:51 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Paul Bettencourt, Mr. Briscoe Cain, Mr. Bryan Hughes and Mr. Andrew Murr [22-50435] (AS) [Entered: 05/27/2022 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
