Lebron-Rivera v. State of Texas
| Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera |
| State of Texas, Midland County, Midland County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Richard Gillete and Sheriff Gary Painter |
| 22-50446 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/11/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee deadline satisfied. Fee due on 08/15/2022 for Appellant Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera [22-50446] (MRW) [Entered: 07/14/2022 04:28 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9863069-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 08/01/2022 for Appellant Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera [22-50446] (LLL) [Entered: 06/06/2022 11:09 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9862525-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera. [9862525-1] [22-50446] (LLL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:28 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9862501-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera. [9862501-1] [22-50446] (LLL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:21 PM] |
| PARTY LIMIT CASE. (FOR A FULL LIST OF PARTIES FOR THIS APPEAL, PLEASE REFER TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DOCKET SHEET.) [22-50446] (LLL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:10 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Angel Luis Lebron-Rivera [22-50446] (LLL) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
