DC Operating v. Paxton
| DC Operating, L.L.C., doing business as Dreams, Nuvia Heidi Medina and Michelle Corral |
| Attorney General Ken Paxton, in his official capacity, Ed Serna, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Workforce Commission, Unknown Commissioner of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, Richard D. Wiles, in his official capacity as Sheriff of El Paso County, Texas and Ricardo A. Samaniego, in his official capacity as County Judge of El Paso County, Texas |
| 22-50612 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER granting in part Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellants DC Operating, L.L.C., Ms. Nuvia Heidi Medina and Ms. Michelle Corral [ # 9932887-2 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/28/2022 for Appellants Michelle Corral, DC Operating, L.L.C. and Nuvia Heidi Medina [22-50612] (MFY) [Entered: 09/08/2022 10:25 AM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellants DC Operating, L.L.C., Ms. Michelle Corral and Ms. Nuvia Heidi Medina to extend time to file brief as appellant until 11/28/2022 [9932887-2]. Date of service: 09/06/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Hamilton, Kercher, Untereker; Attorney for Appellant: Lerma [22-50612] (Eduardo Nicanor Lerma Sr.) [Entered: 09/06/2022 12:08 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney John E. Untereker for Appellee Ricardo A. Samaniego in 22-50612, Attorney John E. Untereker for Appellee Richard D. Wiles in 22-50612 [22-50612] (MFY) [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:53 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. John E. Untereker for Mr. Ricardo A. Samaniego and Mr. Richard D. Wiles for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50612] (John E. Untereker ) [Entered: 09/02/2022 11:06 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/28/2022 for Appellants Michelle Corral, DC Operating, L.L.C. and Nuvia Heidi Medina. [22-50612] (CMB) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:34 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50612] (CMB) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:33 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-50612] (MAS) [Entered: 08/10/2022 09:31 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-10. Electronic ROA due on 08/25/2022. [22-50612] (MAS) [Entered: 08/10/2022 09:34 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Eric J. Hamilton for party(s) Appellee Unknown Commissioner of the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation Appellee Ken Paxton Appellee Ed Serna, in case 22-50612 [22-50612] (MFY) [Entered: 08/10/2022 03:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50612] (Eric J. Hamilton ) [Entered: 08/09/2022 12:56 PM] |
| NOTICE RECEIVED from Nalene Benavides that the transcript ordered by Appellants Ms. Michelle Corral, DC Operating, L.L.C. and Ms. Nuvia Heidi Medina is complete and has been filed in the District Court. [22-50612] (Nalene Benavides ) [Entered: 08/09/2022 05:49 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9895264-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 08/03/2022 for Appellants Michelle Corral, DC Operating, L.L.C. and Nuvia Heidi Medina [22-50612] (MFY) [Entered: 07/19/2022 09:41 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Ms. Michelle Corral, DC Operating, L.L.C. and Ms. Nuvia Heidi Medina [22-50612] (RSM) [Entered: 07/13/2022 12:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
