McGee v. Armstrong
| Rickey L. McGee |
| Warden Bruce L. Armstrong, Major Michael Voyles, Major Treyvon Hoecult, Cody Rodriguez, Katherine Knicely, Elizabeth Maldanado, Captain Ricky Sanders, Jennifer Helms, Enrique Montenegro, Shane Beasley, Bryan Collier and Amicus Curiae |
| 22-50722 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| COURT ORDER dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction [9949571-2]. Mandate issue date is 10/26/2022. [22-50722] (MFY) [Entered: 10/04/2022 01:56 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 08/31/2022 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Rickey L. McGee. Initial partial filing fee assessed.Fee deadline satisfied [22-50722] (MFY) [Entered: 09/02/2022 04:30 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9932124-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-50722] (MFY) [Entered: 09/02/2022 04:24 PM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9929707-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rickey L. McGee. [9929707-1] [22-50722] (MFY) [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:54 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9917270-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 10/11/2022 for Appellant Rickey L. McGee [22-50722] (MFY) [Entered: 08/16/2022 02:20 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Rickey L. McGee [22-50722] (RSM) [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
