Cascino v. Scott
Joseph Daniel Cascino, Shanda Marie Sansing and Brenda Li Garcia |
John B. Scott, Texas Secretary of State |
22-50748 |
August 17, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Voting (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
EXTENSION RECEIVED for Appellants Mr. Joseph Daniel Cascino, Ms. Brenda Li Garcia and Ms. Shanda Marie Sansing. Extension Granted to and including 11/23/2022. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/23/2022 for Appellants Joseph Daniel Cascino, Brenda Li Garcia and Shanda Marie Sansing [22-50748] (MVM) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:01 PM] |
UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellants Mr. Joseph Daniel Cascino, Ms. Brenda Li Garcia and Ms. Shanda Marie Sansing for filing Brief of Appellants until 11/23/2022 [22-50748] (Chad Wilson Dunn ) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:18 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Sonni Waknin for party(s) Appellant Shanda Marie Sansing Appellant Brenda Li Garcia Appellant Joseph Daniel Cascino, in case 22-50748 [22-50748] (RSM) [Entered: 09/27/2022 12:00 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50748] (Bernadette Reyes ) [Entered: 09/26/2022 12:29 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bernadette Reyes for party(s) Appellant Shanda Marie Sansing Appellant Brenda Li Garcia Appellant Joseph Daniel Cascino, in case 22-50748 [22-50748] (RSM) [Entered: 09/26/2022 02:56 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50748] (Sonni Waknin ) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:17 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Chad Wilson Dunn for Appellant Brenda Li Garcia in 22-50748, Attorney Chad Wilson Dunn for Appellant Shanda Marie Sansing in 22-50748, Attorney Chad Wilson Dunn for Appellant Joseph Daniel Cascino in 22-50748 [22-50748] (RSM) [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:19 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Chad Wilson Dunn, Esq. for Mr. Joseph Daniel Cascino, Ms. Brenda Li Garcia and Ms. Shanda Marie Sansing for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50748] (Chad Wilson Dunn ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:44 AM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/24/2022 for Appellants Joseph Daniel Cascino, Brenda Li Garcia and Shanda Marie Sansing. [22-50748] (LEF) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:44 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50748] (LEF) [Entered: 09/12/2022 11:43 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Abrams for party(s) Appellee John B. Scott, in case 22-50748 [22-50748] (RSM) [Entered: 08/29/2022 01:56 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50748] (Michael Abrams ) [Entered: 08/29/2022 01:30 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Joseph Daniel Cascino, Ms. Brenda Li Garcia and Ms. Shanda Marie Sansing advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 08/23/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Corbello; Attorney for Appellant: Dunn [22-50748] (Chad Wilson Dunn ) [Entered: 08/23/2022 09:27 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-438. Electronic ROA due on 09/07/2022. [22-50748] (CBW) [Entered: 08/23/2022 10:10 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9918678-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 09/01/2022 for Appellants Joseph Daniel Cascino, Brenda Li Garcia and Shanda Marie Sansing [22-50748] (CBW) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:54 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Joseph Daniel Cascino, Ms. Brenda Li Garcia and Ms. Shanda Marie Sansing [22-50748] (CBW) [Entered: 08/17/2022 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.