LoRusso v. Cruz
| Michael Anthony LoRusso |
| Senator Ted Cruz |
| 22-50829 |
| September 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Mandamus and Other (Prisoner) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9943545-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 11/14/2022 for Appellant Michael Anthony LoRusso [22-50829] (LEF) [Entered: 09/20/2022 04:39 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Michael Anthony LoRusso [22-50829] (MVM) [Entered: 09/16/2022 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: LoRusso v. Cruz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Michael Anthony LoRusso | |
| Represented By: | Michael Anthony LoRusso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Senator Ted Cruz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
