Lartigue v. Northside Indep
Kaylee Lartigue |
Northside Independent School District |
22-50854 |
September 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Lartigue v. Northside Indep |
Lartigue v. Northside Indep |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NO COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT RECEIVED for Ms. Letitia Moncivais. Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Letitia Moncivais, Dt. Ct. Rprt. Time Begins: 10/11/2022. Transcript deadlines created - Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment deadline canceled. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 11/10/2022 for Letitia Moncivais [22-50854] (MVM) [Entered: 10/28/2022 08:28 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Katie Elizabeth Payne for party(s) Appellee Northside Independent School District, in case 22-50854 [22-50854] (CCR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:32 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Donald Craig Wood for Appellee Northside Independent School District in 22-50854 [22-50854] (CCR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 01:35 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50854] (Katie Elizabeth Payne ) [Entered: 10/18/2022 03:50 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50854] (Donald Craig Wood ) [Entered: 10/18/2022 03:47 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Kaylee Lartigue. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Letitia Moncivais, Proceeding Type and Date: Status Conference 08/26/2022 , Motion Hearing 09/07/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 10/21/2022 for Letitia Moncivais. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9955973-2 ] [22-50854] (MVM) [Entered: 10/10/2022 10:45 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Martin J. Cirkiel for Appellant Kaylee Lartigue in 22-50854 [22-50854] (MVM) [Entered: 10/10/2022 10:11 AM] |
ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Kaylee Lartiguefor the Court to process. Date of service: 10/06/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Cirkiel; Attorney for Appellee: Wood. [22-50854] (Martin J. Cirkiel ) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:50 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Martin J. Cirkiel for Kaylee Lartigue for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50854] (Martin J. Cirkiel ) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:51 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9953976-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 10/19/2022 for Appellant Kaylee Lartigue [22-50854] (RSM) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:07 PM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Kaylee Lartigue [22-50854] (AS) [Entered: 09/29/2022 11:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Lartigue v. Northside Indep | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Kaylee Lartigue | |
Represented By: | Martin J. Cirkiel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Northside Independent School District | |
Represented By: | Donald Craig Wood |
Represented By: | Katie Elizabeth Payne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.