Thatcher v. State of Texas
Albert Richard Thatcher |
State of Texas, McLennan County, Texas, McLennan County Jail, Ricky Armstrong, Officer Jeremy Johnson, McLennan County Sheriff Department, City of Bellmead, Bellmead Police Department, McLennan County MHMR, Deborah Santa'Anna, Sheehy, Lovelace, & Mayfield, Parnell McNamara, E. Alan Bennett, 19th District Court of McLennan County, Ralph Strother, Doctor William Lee Carter, Doctor Stephen L. Mark, District Attorney Barry Johnson, Amanda Smith and State Bar of Texas |
22-50862 |
October 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Albert Richard Thatcher. [22-50862] (MFY) [Entered: 10/26/2022 11:44 AM] |
SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Richard Thatcher. [22-50862] (MFY) [Entered: 10/26/2022 11:31 AM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion requesting action by before mentioned appellate court received from Appellant Mr. Albert Richard Thatcher because unable to determine relief [22-50862] (MFY) [Entered: 10/26/2022 11:10 AM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9955623-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Miscellaneous due on 11/07/2022 for Appellant Albert Richard Thatcher - Monitoring for a signed NOA. [22-50862] (PAC) [Entered: 10/06/2022 08:52 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Albert Richard Thatcher [22-50862] (RSM) [Entered: 10/03/2022 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.