Nobles v. Egal
| Ida Renae Nobles, Individually, Kadeidra Bell, Guardian for K.N., a minor, as heir at law to the estate of Landon Nobles and Michelle Dashaun Smith, Guardian for L.N., a minor as heir at law to the estate of Landon Nobles |
| Sergeant Richard Egal, Austin Police Department and Corporal Maxwell Johnson |
| 22-50871 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENT Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Lily Iva Reznik, Est. Completion Dt: 11/25/2022, Est. No.of Pgs: 359, Dt. Fin Arrangements Made: 10/25/2022, Proceeding Type and Date: Pre-Trial Conference 12/02/2021 , Motion Hearing 06/01/2022 , Jury Trial Day 5 12/13/2021, Hearing on Post Trial Motions (ALREADY ON FILE SEE DOC# 99). Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment ddl satisfied. Transcript Due/Court Reporter Discount Date is 11/25/2022 for Lily Iva Reznik, Court Reporter [22-50871] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/26/2022 02:01 PM] |
| COURT REPORTER ACKNOWLEDGMENT received from Lily Iva Reznik. [22-50871] (Lily Iva Reznik ) [Entered: 10/25/2022 06:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Marshall Ayres Bowen for party(s) Appellant Richard Egal Appellant Maxwell Johnson, in case 22-50871 [22-50871] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Amanda Garrett Taylor for Appellant Maxwell Johnson in 22-50871, Attorney Amanda Garrett Taylor for Appellant Richard Egal in 22-50871 [22-50871] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:11 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnson. DETAILS: Transcript Order: Court Reporter: Lily Iva Reznik, Proceeding Type and Date: Final Pre-Trial Conference 12/02/2021 , Motion Hearing 06/01/2022. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. Ct. Reporter Acknowledgment due on 10/24/2022 for Lily Reznik, Court Reporter. Electronic Filing Processed: [ # 9958994-2 ] [22-50871] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:01 PM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellants Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnsonfor the Court to process. Date of service: 10/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Davis; Attorney for Appellant: Taylor. [22-50871] (Amanda Garrett Taylor ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 05:38 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Amanda Garrett Taylor for Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnson for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50871] (Amanda Garrett Taylor ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 04:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-50871] (Marshall Ayres Bowen ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 04:50 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnson advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [22-50871] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellants Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnson advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. Date of Service: 10/11/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Davis; Attorney for Appellant: Taylor [22-50871] (Amanda Garrett Taylor ) [Entered: 10/11/2022 05:36 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9957124-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 10/24/2022 for Appellants Richard Egal and Maxwell Johnson [22-50871] (RAJ) [Entered: 10/07/2022 01:44 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellants Mr. Richard Egal and Mr. Maxwell Johnson [22-50871] (MFY) [Entered: 10/05/2022 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
