Partain v. Hallmark
| Marshall Ray Partain |
| Officer Jason Hallmark, Badge #6307 Austin Police Department and Officer Sharday Melero, Badge #8771 Austin Police Department |
| 22-50959 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/13/2022 granting IFP in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) for Appellant Mr. Marshall Ray Partain. Initial partial filing fee assessed. [22-50959] (LEF) [Entered: 12/29/2022 11:18 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Marshall Ray Partain to appoint counsel [10006507-2]. [22-50959] (MRW) [Entered: 12/20/2022 10:52 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. Marshall Ray Partain. Fee deadline satisfied. [22-50959] (MRW) [Entered: 12/13/2022 11:29 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9992827-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-50959] (LEF) [Entered: 11/30/2022 11:57 AM] |
| CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [9989129-2] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marshall Ray Partain. [9989129-1] [22-50959] (LEF) [Entered: 11/22/2022 04:34 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9979331-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 01/03/2023 for Appellant Marshall Ray Partain [22-50959] (LEF) [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:14 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Marshall Ray Partain [22-50959] (AS) [Entered: 11/03/2022 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
