Esquivel v. Kendrick
| Robert J. Esquivel and Robert James Esquivel |
| David Kendrick, Badge #0567, Patrol Division, San Antonio Police Department, Logan Eastburn, DPS, Trooper #14720, Ryan Bibby, DPS, Trooper #14593, Nicholas Wingate, DPS, Trooper #13157, San Antonio Police Department and Texas Highway Patrol Department of Public Safety |
| 22-50979 |
| November 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel for clarification of the Order dated 12/12/2022 denying Motion to add parties filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel in 22-50979 [ # 9993135-2 ], for reconsideration of the 12/12/2022 court order denying Motion to add parties filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel in 22-50979 [ # 9993135-2 ] [10012151-3]. Date of service: 12/27/2022 Document is insufficient for the following reasons: a certificate of service and a certificate of conference is needed. A signature is also required Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 01/09/2023 for Appellant Robert James Esquivel [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 12/30/2022 10:22 AM] |
| COURT ORDER denying Motion to add parties filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel [ # 9993135-2 ] [22-50979] (MBC) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:33 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-50979] (DDL) [Entered: 12/02/2022 09:43 AM] |
| LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: motion for new trial is pending in the district court [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 12/02/2022 04:02 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel to add parties as appellees to the appeal [9993135-2]. Date of service: 11/28/2022 [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:23 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the motion to clarify and for extension of time to file transcript order received from Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel because it is unnecessary. Transcripts cannot be requested in this case because there were no hearings held in the district court [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 11/29/2022 09:23 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel [ # 9991062-2 ] [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 11/28/2022 03:15 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Robert James Esquivel for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [9991062-2]. Date of service: 11/28/2022 [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:40 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Penelope Maley for Appellee Texas Highway Patrol Department of Public Safety in 22-50979, Attorney Penelope Maley for Appellee Nicholas Wingate in 22-50979, Attorney Penelope Maley for Appellee Ryan Bibby in 22-50979, Attorney Penelope Maley for Appellee Logan Eastburn in 22-50979 [22-50979] (LEF) [Entered: 11/23/2022 04:14 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Penelope Maley for Mr. Ryan Bibby, Mr. Logan Eastburn, Texas Highway Patrol Department of Public Safety and Mr. Nicholas Wingate for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-50979] (Penelope Maley ) [Entered: 11/22/2022 05:59 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9981463-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-50979] (MAS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 05:02 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 5:20-CV-377. Electronic ROA due on 11/25/2022. [22-50979] (MAS) [Entered: 11/10/2022 05:06 PM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Robert J. Esquivel [22-50979] (MVM) [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
