Simmons v. Salazar
| Ryan Simmons and Ryan David Simmons |
| Javier Salazar, Bexar County Sheriff, Corey Maciel, Lieutenant, SERT Sergeant FNU Mata and Mark Nava, Deputy |
| 22-51058 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 12/28/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Ryan Simmons because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due or file motion for IFP in 5CCA on 02/06/2023 for Appellant Ryan Simmons [22-51058]--[Edited 01/05/2023 by CAS] (CAS) [Entered: 01/05/2023 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the copy of appellant's notice of appeal, copy of motion filed in district court (#21), additional supporting affidavits, and a petition for writ of certiorari received from Appellant Mr. Ryan Simmons because we are unable to determine relief sought and any additional supporting documents must be filed in the district court. [22-51058] (CAG) [Entered: 12/29/2022 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Ryan Simmons to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [22-51058] (MRW) [Entered: 12/20/2022 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 12/27/2022 for Appellant Ryan Simmons [22-51058] (RSM) [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Simmons [22-51058] (LEF) [Entered: 12/07/2022 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
