Colony Insurance v. First Mercury Insurance
| Colony Insurance Company |
| First Mercury Insurance Company |
| 22-51114 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Insurance |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Colony Insurance Company v. First Mercury Insurance Company
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/20/2023 for Appellant Colony Insurance Company. [22-51114] (DDL) [Entered: 02/08/2023 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-51114] (DDL) [Entered: 02/08/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 12 Attorney Matthew Rigney is advised to resubmit an appearance form. Reason: The submitted appearance form does not match the registered attorney. [22-51114] (LBM) [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-51114] (Stephen Andrew Melendi ) [Entered: 01/25/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:20-CV-474. Electronic ROA due on 02/06/2023. [22-51114] (PAC) [Entered: 01/20/2023 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes - No hearings. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [22-51114] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Colony Insurance Company advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 01/19/2023 via US mail - Attorney for Appellee: Martin; email - Attorney for Appellee: Martin; Attorney for Appellant: Melendi [22-51114] (Stephen Andrew Melendi ) [Entered: 01/19/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephen Andrew Melendi for Appellant Colony Insurance Company in 22-51114 [22-51114] (PAC) [Entered: 01/19/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-51114] (Stephen Andrew Melendi ) [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 01/19/2023 for Appellant Colony Insurance Company [22-51114] (MVM) [Entered: 01/04/2023 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Colony Insurance Company [22-51114] (MFY) [Entered: 12/23/2022 01:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Colony Insurance v. First Mercury Insurance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Colony Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Andrew Melendi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: First Mercury Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Brian S. Martin |
| Represented By: | Brian Scott Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
