David Smith-GarciaIn re: David Smith-Garcia
| In re: David Smith-Garcia, formerly known as David Garland Atwood, II |
| 22-60037 |
| January 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [22-60037] (MRW) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:54 AM] |
| EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 9756910-2 ] filed by Movant Mr. David Smith-Garcia [22-60037] (MRW) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:52 AM] |
| PETITION filed by Movant Mr. David Smith-Garcia for writ of mandamus [9756910-2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 01/17/2022. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 02/17/2022 for Movant David Smith-Garcia. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: need certificate of service [22-60037] (MRW) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:46 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [22-60037] (MRW) [Entered: 01/18/2022 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Smith-GarciaIn re: David Smith-Garcia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: David Smith-Garcia, formerly known as David Garland Atwood, II | |
| Represented By: | David Smith-Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
