Courtney v. USA
| Gregory Courtney |
| United States of America |
| 22-60131 |
| March 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Tax Suits (Tax from DC) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [22-60131] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Gregory Courtney. Date of service: 05/05/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: McGee; Attorney for Appellees: Thankachan, Wasserman [22-60131] (James Gary McGee Jr.) [Entered: 05/05/2022 12:47 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED # of Copies Provided: 0 A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 05/16/2022 for Appellant Gregory Courtney. Appellee's Brief due on 06/01/2022 for Appellee United States of America [22-60131] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Gregory Courtney. Date of service: 05/02/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: McGee; Attorney for Appellees: Thankachan, Wasserman [22-60131] (James Gary McGee Jr.) [Entered: 05/02/2022 05:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Carl D. Wasserman for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-60131 [22-60131] (CB) [Entered: 03/24/2022 02:42 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 05/02/2022 for Appellant Gregory Courtney. [22-60131] (DDL) [Entered: 03/23/2022 01:39 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60131] (DDL) [Entered: 03/23/2022 01:39 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60131] (Carl D. Wasserman ) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:40 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney James Gary McGee Jr. for Appellant Gregory Courtney in 22-60131 [22-60131] (CB) [Entered: 03/22/2022 01:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. James Gary McGee, Jr., Esq. for Mr. Gregory Courtney for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60131] (James Gary McGee Jr.) [Entered: 03/22/2022 09:13 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9796876-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60131] (CB) [Entered: 03/14/2022 10:37 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:21-CV-589. Electronic ROA due on 03/29/2022. [22-60131] (CB) [Entered: 03/14/2022 10:39 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Courtney [22-60131] (MCS) [Entered: 03/09/2022 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Courtney v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Gregory Courtney | |
| Represented By: | James Gary McGee Esq. Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Jikky Thankachan |
| Represented By: | Carl D. Wasserman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
