Holden v. Reiser
| Kingy Ossarius Holden |
| Warden S. Reiser |
| 22-60148 |
| March 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 05/03/2022 09:32 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Jessica Nicole Bourne for Mr. S. Reiser for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60148] (Jessica Nicole Bourne ) [Entered: 05/03/2022 08:24 AM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden. # of Copies Provided: 1. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 05/03/2022 09:34 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED TO APPELLEE. Appellee's Brief due on 06/02/2022 for Appellee S. Reiser. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 05/03/2022 09:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jessica Nicole Bourne for Appellee S. Reiser in 22-60148. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 05/03/2022 02:57 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-400. Electronic ROA due on 05/12/2022. [22-60148] (MCS) [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:23 AM] |
| FEE PAID by Appellant Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden. Fee deadline satisfied [22-60148] (MCS) [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:22 AM] |
| LETTER filed by Appellant Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden advising us to file the premature brief at the appropriate time. Additionally, the appellate filing fee of $505.00 has been mailed to the USDC. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:03 PM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Appellant's Brief because it is premature [22-60148] (MAS) [Entered: 04/11/2022 01:06 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden to extend time to pay filing fee until 05/05/2022 [9812280-2]. [22-60148] (MRW) [Entered: 03/31/2022 02:51 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to pay filing fee filed by Appellant Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden [ # 9812280-2 ] Fee deadline updated to 05/05/2022 for Appellant Kingy Ossarius Holden [22-60148] (MRW) [Entered: 03/31/2022 02:53 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9802446-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 04/05/2022 for Appellant Kingy Ossarius Holden. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 03/21/2022 10:49 AM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kingy Ossarius Holden. [22-60148] (SEP) [Entered: 03/17/2022 04:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Holden v. Reiser | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Kingy Ossarius Holden | |
| Represented By: | Kingy Ossarius Holden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Warden S. Reiser | |
| Represented By: | Jessica Nicole Bourne |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
