Affordable Care v. McIntyre
| Affordable Care, L.L.C. |
| Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD and Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C. |
| 22-60245 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Nancy A. Cundiff for party(s) Appellant Affordable Care, L.L.C., in case 22-60245. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 06/06/2022 01:36 PM] |
| LETTER ISSUED due to returned mail. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/05/2022 for Appellant Affordable Care, L.L.C. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 06/06/2022 03:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60245] (Nancy A. Cundiff ) [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:58 AM] |
| DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Level I ECF Extension Request received from Appellant Affordable Care, L.L.C. because the extension request is unnecessary. Appellant's brief deadline was updated as briefing notice was returned from Appellant's attorney. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 06/06/2022 04:00 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-60245] (Kelly Dagger ) [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:57 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Paul Sun for party(s) Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C., Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, in case 22-60245. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:17 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kelly Dagger for party(s) Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C., Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, in case 22-60245. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:21 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60245] (Paul Sun ) [Entered: 05/10/2022 11:56 AM] |
| ATTORNEY NOT PARTICIPATING. Karl C. Hightower is designated as inactive in this case. Reason: New lead counsel named. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 05/11/2022 04:19 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Katherine Hewes Hood for party(s) Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C., Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, in case 22-60245. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 05/05/2022 01:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-60245] (Katherine Hewes Hood ) [Entered: 05/04/2022 11:17 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Karl Crawford Hightower for Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C. in 22-60245, Attorney Karl Crawford Hightower for Appellee Raeline K. McIntyre in 22-60245 [22-60245] (CB) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:49 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60245] (CMB) [Entered: 04/28/2022 12:45 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/07/2022 for Appellant Affordable Care, L.L.C.. [22-60245] (CMB) [Entered: 04/28/2022 12:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Karl Crawford Hightower, Esq. for Ms. Raeline K. McIntyre and Raeline K. McIntyre, DMD, P.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60245] (Karl Crawford Hightower ) [Entered: 04/28/2022 05:00 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9833478-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 04/27/2022 12:59 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:21-CV-85. Electronic ROA due on 05/12/2022. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 04/27/2022 01:01 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Affordable Care, L.L.C. [22-60245] (SEP) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
