Munoz-De Zalaya v. Garland
| Yanci Liseth Munoz-De Zalaya, Jose Roberto Zelaya Guerrero, Jose Roberto Zelaya-Munoz and Yanci Mariela Zelaya-Munoz |
| Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General |
| 22-60505 |
| September 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9941471-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60505] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 04:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Brandon Thomas Callahan for party(s) Respondent Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, in case 22-60505. [22-60505] (SEP) [Entered: 09/16/2022 10:50 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60505] (Brandon Thomas Callahan ) [Entered: 09/16/2022 09:23 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Yanci Mariela Zelaya-Munoz in 22-60505, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Jose Roberto Zelaya-Munoz in 22-60505, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Jose Roberto Zelaya Guerrero in 22-60505, Attorney Jesus A. Macias for Petitioner Yanci Liseth Munoz-De Zalaya in 22-60505 [22-60505] (MAS) [Entered: 09/15/2022 11:33 AM] |
| IMMIGRATION CASE docketed. Petition for review filed by Petitioners Ms. Yanci Liseth Munoz-De Zalaya, Mr. Jose Roberto Zelaya Guerrero, Mr. Jose Roberto Zelaya-Munoz and Ms. Yanci Mariela Zelaya-Munoz. Date received in 5th Circuit: 09/14/2022. Immigration File Number: a209 842 730,a208 278 752,a209 842 729,a209 842 728 Administrative Record due on 10/25/2022 [22-60505] (WMJ) [Entered: 09/15/2022 10:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
