Saddler v. Errington
| Johnny Lee Saddler |
| Joe Errington |
| 22-60512 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler in 22-60512 [ # 9979758-2 ].. Affidavit deadline satisfied. [22-60512] (MRW) [Entered: 11/15/2022 03:25 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler to proceed in forma pauperis [9979758-2] Fee deadline canceled. Affidavit due on 11/30/2022 for Appellant Johnny Lee Saddler, to appoint counsel [9979758-3]. [22-60512] (MRW) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:29 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler for certificate of appealability [9979772-2]. Motion due deadline satisfied. [22-60512] (MRW) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:35 AM] |
| BRIEF IN SUPPORT filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler in support of Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 9979772-2 ] (INCORPORATED IN MOTION FOR COA) Brief in Support deadline satisfied. [9979773-1] [22-60512] (MRW) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:35 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60512] (CMB) [Entered: 10/27/2022 12:02 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:21-CV-160. Electronic ROA due on 11/14/2022. [22-60512] (AGL) [Entered: 10/27/2022 07:24 AM] |
| LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 12/06/2022 for Appellant Johnny Lee Saddler. Brief in Support due on 12/06/2022 for Appellant Johnny Lee Saddler. Fee deadline updated to 12/06/2022 for Appellant Johnny Lee Saddler [22-60512] (AGL) [Entered: 10/27/2022 07:20 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 10/24/2022 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler. [22-60512] (AGL) [Entered: 10/27/2022 07:20 AM] |
| FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler to the District Court for filing.Fee deadline canceled. [22-60512] (MRW) [Entered: 10/11/2022 02:28 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9944975-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee due on 10/07/2022 for Appellant Johnny Lee Saddler [22-60512] (MAS) [Entered: 09/22/2022 12:37 PM] |
| PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Johnny Lee Saddler [22-60512] (MAS) [Entered: 09/21/2022 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Saddler v. Errington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Johnny Lee Saddler | |
| Represented By: | Johnny Lee Saddler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Joe Errington | |
| Represented By: | Emily Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
