Miller v. Kijakazi
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michele Miller
Defendant / Appellee: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 22-60541
Filed: October 3, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: SSID Title XVI (Social Security)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 18, 2023 Miller v. Kijakazi

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2022 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS filed by Appellant Ms. Michele Miller [ # 9985363-2 ] Date of service: 11/19/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Konoski; Attorney for Appellees: Nobile, Vitemb [22-60541] (Bryan Konoski ) [Entered: 11/19/2022 12:52 PM]
November 17, 2022 PROPOSED SUFFICIENT BRIEF filed by Appellant Ms. Michele Miller [ # 9976364-2 ] Date of service: 11/17/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Konoski; Attorney for Appellees: Nobile, Vitemb [22-60541] (Bryan Konoski ) [Entered: 11/17/2022 10:25 AM]
November 17, 2022 SUFFICIENT RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. # of Copies Provided: 0 Sufficient Record Excerpts deadline satisfied [22-60541] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. Record Excerpts NOT Sufficient as they require: Table of Contents must list the ROA number for all documents. Tab 3 is included in the Record at ROA.1184. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. Record Excerpts deadline satisfied. Sufficient Record Excerpts due on 12/01/2022 for Appellant Michele Miller [22-60541] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Ms. Michele Miller. Date of service: 11/17/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Konoski; Attorney for Appellees: Nobile, Vitemb [22-60541] (Bryan Konoski ) [Entered: 11/17/2022 10:28 AM]
November 3, 2022 SUFFICIENT APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED. Sufficient Brief Due deadline satisfied. [22-60541] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED Brief NOT Sufficient as it requires the Caption does not match the case caption. Additionally the Brief requires the citations to the record on pages 18, 31, and 37 are not formatting properly - on page 18 ROA.22-506541.801, on page 31 ROA.22-60541.912 and on page 37 ROA.22-60541.93. Invalid right margin on page 7. Record Excerpts are required. Instructions to Attorney: PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED NOTICE FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO REMEDY THE DEFAULT. A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Record Excerpts due on 11/21/2022 for Appellant Michele Miller. Appellee's Brief due on 12/05/2022 for Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security [22-60541] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Ms. Michele Miller. Date of service: 11/03/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Konoski; Attorney for Appellees: Nobile, Vitemb [22-60541] (Bryan Konoski ) [Entered: 11/03/2022 04:36 PM]
October 27, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bryan Konoski for Appellant Michele Miller in 22-60541 [22-60541] (CB) [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:11 AM]
October 26, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Bryan Konoski for Ms. Michele Miller for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60541] (Bryan Konoski ) [Entered: 10/26/2022 09:23 AM]
October 18, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kristine Dittmeier Vitemb for party(s) Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, in case 22-60541 [22-60541] (CB) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:24 AM]
October 17, 2022 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60541] (Kristine Dittmeier Vitemb ) [Entered: 10/17/2022 05:09 PM]
October 14, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60541] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 04:19 PM]
October 14, 2022 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/23/2022 for Appellant Michele Miller. [22-60541] (DDL) [Entered: 10/14/2022 04:20 PM]
October 5, 2022 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9955429-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60541] (SEP) [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:22 PM]
October 5, 2022 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:20-CV-382. Electronic ROA due on 10/20/2022. [22-60541] (SEP) [Entered: 10/05/2022 04:23 PM]
October 3, 2022 SOCIAL SECURITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Michele Miller. [22-60541] (SEP) [Entered: 10/03/2022 10:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Miller v. Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Michele Miller
Represented By: Bryan Konoski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Emily Smith Nobile
Represented By: Kristine Dittmeier Vitemb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?