Smith v. Washington
Charles Smith, Jr. |
Corey Washington, Officer Ground Crew |
22-60542 |
October 5, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Prison Conditions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [9956390-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 11/30/2022 for Appellant Charles Smith Jr. [22-60542] (CB) [Entered: 10/06/2022 03:31 PM] |
PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Smith, Jr. [22-60542] (MAS) [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Smith v. Washington | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Charles Smith, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Charles Smith Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Corey Washington, Officer Ground Crew | |
Represented By: | James Henderson Hall Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.