Hines v. Lowndes County, MS
Jason Hines, Individually and as Wrongful Death Beneficiary and as Survivor of Austin Hines |
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Eddie Hawkins, Thomas Culpepper, John Does 1-15 and Thomas Honnoll |
22-60548 |
October 10, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN DELETED FROM THE PUBLIC DOCKET. MOTION AND/OR DOCUMENT UNDER TEMPORARY SEAL pending a ruling by the court filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Hines Unopposed motion for time to file brief This document is unopposed. Date of service: 11/15/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Griffith, Tarpley; Attorney for Appellant: Waide [22-60548] (Daniel Myers Waide ) [Entered: 11/15/2022 10:17 AM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Hines to extend time to file brief as appellant until 12/19/2022 [9983743-2]. Date of service: 11/15/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellees: Griffith, Tarpley; Attorney for Appellant: Waide [22-60548] (Daniel Myers Waide ) [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:57 PM] |
DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion for Extension of Time received from Appellant Mr. Jason Hines because the incorrect event was used to file the motion. The correct event is motion filed on behalf of party [22-60548] (MCS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:36 PM] |
CLERK ORDER granting unopposed motion to extend time to file appellant's brief to and including 12/19/2022 filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Hines [ # 9983743-2 ]. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 12/19/2022 for Appellant Jason Hines [22-60548] (MCS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:07 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60548] (Daniel Myers Waide ) [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:31 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Daniel Myers Waide for Appellant Jason Hines in 22-60548 [22-60548] (MCS) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:58 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 11/28/2022 for Appellant Jason Hines. [22-60548] (DDL) [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:41 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? Yes Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60548] (DDL) [Entered: 10/19/2022 11:40 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Daniel J. Griffith for Appellee Thomas Honnoll in 22-60548, Attorney Daniel J. Griffith for Appellee Thomas Culpepper in 22-60548, Attorney Daniel J. Griffith for Appellee Eddie Hawkins in 22-60548, Attorney Daniel J. Griffith for Appellee Lowndes County, Mississippi in 22-60548 [22-60548] (MCS) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:08 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bethany A. Tarpley for party(s) Appellee Thomas Culpepper Appellee Eddie Hawkins Appellee Lowndes County, Mississippi Appellee Thomas Honnoll, in case 22-60548 [22-60548] (MCS) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:14 AM] |
APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Daniel J. Griffith, Esq. for Mr. Thomas Culpepper, Mr. Eddie Hawkins, Mr. Thomas Honnoll and Lowndes County, Mississippi for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60548] (Daniel J. Griffith ) [Entered: 10/13/2022 04:41 PM] |
APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-60548] (Bethany A. Tarpley ) [Entered: 10/13/2022 04:42 PM] |
INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9959292-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60548] (AGL) [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:53 AM] |
ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 1:21-CV-52. Electronic ROA due on 10/27/2022. [22-60548] (AGL) [Entered: 10/12/2022 10:56 AM] |
CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jason Hines [22-60548] (AGL) [Entered: 10/10/2022 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.