Burrell v. Welting
| Thomas Burrell |
| Angela Welting, Personal Representative and Executrix of the Estate of Wayne M. Carlisle |
| 22-60561 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to order transcript and make financial arrangements with court reporter[9980545-2] [22-60561] (WMJ) [Entered: 11/10/2022 08:39 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Katherine Mayo Portner for party(s) Appellee Angela Welting, in case 22-60561 [22-60561] (PAC) [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Bethany A. Tarpley for party(s) Appellee Angela Welting, in case 22-60561 [22-60561] (PAC) [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60561] (Bethany A. Tarpley ) [Entered: 11/03/2022 02:44 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [22-60561] (Katherine Mayo Portner ) [Entered: 11/03/2022 02:26 PM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER 10/20/2022 withdrawing Michael Brown as counsel for Appellant Thomas Burrell and substituting Burrell as a pro se litigant in 22-60561. [22-60561] (AGL) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:16 PM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9965563-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Transcript order due on 11/04/2022 for Appellant Thomas Burrell [22-60561] (AGL) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:17 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Thomas Burrell [22-60561] (AGL) [Entered: 10/18/2022 12:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
