Dee v. Gater
| Martha Dee |
| Donald Gater, in his Individual and Official Capacity |
| 22-60587 |
| October 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD EXCERPTS FILED. [22-60587] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: RECORD EXCERPTS FILED by Appellant Mr. Donald Gater. Date of service: 12/14/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Ross; Attorney for Appellant: Springer [22-60587] (Francis Starr Springer ) [Entered: 12/14/2022 08:34 PM] |
| APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED A/Pet's Brief deadline satisfied. Appellee's Brief due on 01/13/2023 for Appellee Martha Dee [22-60587] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: APPELLANT'S BRIEF FILED by Mr. Donald Gater. Date of service: 12/14/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Ross; Attorney for Appellant: Springer [22-60587] (Francis Starr Springer ) [Entered: 12/14/2022 08:30 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Francis Starr Springer for Mr. Donald Gater for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-60587] (Francis Starr Springer ) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:53 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Francis Starr Springer for Appellant Donald Gater in 22-60587 [22-60587] (MAS) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:27 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. (NO proceedings)) [22-60587] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Donald Gater advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 11/04/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellee: Ross; Attorney for Appellant: Springer [22-60587] (Francis Starr Springer ) [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:19 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 12/14/2022 for Appellant Donald Gater. [22-60587] (SEP) [Entered: 11/04/2022 08:51 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-60587] (SEP) [Entered: 11/04/2022 08:51 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9973473-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [22-60587] (SEP) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:34 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:20-CV-752. Electronic ROA due on 11/16/2022. [22-60587] (SEP) [Entered: 11/01/2022 08:36 AM] |
| CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Donald Gater. [22-60587] (SEP) [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dee v. Gater | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: Martha Dee | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Mishune Ross Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Donald Gater, in his Individual and Official Capacity | |
| Represented By: | Francis Starr Springer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
