Neal v. Vannoy
| Jarrell Neal |
| Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary |
| 22-70007 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus - Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| STATE COURT PAPERS FILED. Exhibits, 4 Boxes SCP. State Court Papers deadline satisfied. [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 08/10/2022 07:55 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/14/2022 for Appellant Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary. [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 08/05/2022 11:13 AM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? No. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:03 PM] |
| PAPER STATE COURT PAPERS REQUESTED FROM DISTRICT COURT for 2:15-CV-5390. State Court Papers due on 08/16/2022. [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 08/01/2022 03:04 PM] |
| ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:15-CV-5390. Electronic ROA due on 08/15/2022. [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 07/29/2022 07:47 AM] |
| DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/27/2022 the States Motion for Stay of Judgment and Release Order Pending Appeal88 is GRANTED [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 07/29/2022 07:46 AM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Matthew R. Clauss for Appellant Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary in 22-70007 [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2022 01:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [22-70007] (Matthew R. Clauss ) [Entered: 07/06/2022 11:29 AM] |
| ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Mr. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiaryfor the Court to process. Date of service: 06/21/2022 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Clauss; Attorney for Appellee: Kappel. [22-70007] (Matthew R. Clauss ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 11:24 AM] |
| INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [9874884-2] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Awaiting ruling on motion to stay judgment pending appeal (DE #234). [22-70007] (MFY) [Entered: 06/21/2022 02:26 PM] |
| Attorney Rachel Conner added as counsel of record for Appellee Jarrell Neal in 22-70007. [22-70007] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/21/2022 05:03 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Mr. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [22-70007] (MFY) [Entered: 06/21/2022 02:33 PM] |
| DEATH PENALTY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary [22-70007] (MRW) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Neal v. Vannoy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jarrell Neal | |
| Represented By: | Cecelia Trenticosta Kappel |
| Represented By: | Rachel Isabel Conner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary | |
| Represented By: | Matthew R. Clauss Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
