Thomas v. Cagel
Plaintiff / Appellant: Lorenzo Allen Thomas
Defendant / Appellee: Micheal Cagel and David Hafer
Case Number: 23-10045
Filed: January 16, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Lorenzo Allen Thomas for reconsideration of the 02/22/2023 court order granting jurisdictional recommendation to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [14] [24]. Date of service: 03/03/2023 Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 03/16/2023 for Appellee Micheal Cagel (CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE AND CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE REQUIRED) [23-10045] (CAS) [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:56 PM]
February 22, 2023 Filing 22 COURT ORDER granting jurisdictional recommendation to dismiss appeal for lack of jurisdiction [14]. Mandate issue date is 03/16/2023. [23-10045] (CAS) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:05 PM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 13 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: AA Recommendation to submit to court for jurisdictional review. Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-10045] (CAS) [Entered: 02/14/2023 09:59 AM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney James Thomas Jeffrey Jr. for Appellee David Hafer in 23-10045 [23-10045] (PAC) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:00 AM]
February 9, 2023 Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga for party(s) Appellee Micheal Cagel, in case 23-10045 [23-10045] (LEF) [Entered: 02/09/2023 04:30 PM]
February 9, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Allen Klement for Appellee Micheal Cagel in 23-10045 [23-10045] (LEF) [Entered: 02/09/2023 04:29 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. James Thomas Jeffrey, Jr., Esq. for Mr. David Hafer for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10045] (James Thomas Jeffrey Jr.) [Entered: 02/08/2023 01:45 PM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-10045] (Christopher Allen Klement ) [Entered: 02/07/2023 03:13 PM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10045] (Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga ) [Entered: 02/07/2023 03:04 PM]
January 16, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Lorenzo Allen Thomas [23-10045] (CAS) [Entered: 01/16/2023 02:39 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas v. Cagel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Lorenzo Allen Thomas
Represented By: Lorenzo Allen Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Micheal Cagel
Represented By: Christopher Allen Klement
Represented By: Darrell Gerard-Marc Noga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: David Hafer
Represented By: James Thomas Jeffrey Esq. Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?