Glaspie v. Ermatinger
| Kevin Neal Glaspie |
| Cindy Ermatinger, Judge of 443rd District Court, Janet Traylor, Attorney, John Fehler and Brad Norman, Chief Sheriff |
| 23-10099 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Letter received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because we are unable to determine the relef you are seeking [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 08/04/2023 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 19 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Trust Fund Statement received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because in light of the clerk's order of 5/23/23 the appeal is dismissed because this circuit previously have dismissed 3 or more of your civil cases as frivolous. Therefore, pursuant to the three strikes provision of 28 USC 1915 you are required to pay the full appellate filing fee. [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 07/24/2023 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 18 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the letter received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because in light of the clerk's order of 5/23/23 [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 07/20/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie to reopen case [17] Default has NOT been remedied. [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 07/06/2023 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 15 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [15] [23-10099] (LEF) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 14 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Correspondence received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because unable to determine the relief you are seeking [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 05/23/2023 08:25 AM] |
| Filing 13 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 05/17/2023 for Appellant Kevin Neal Glaspie [23-10099] (LEF) [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising we are unable to determine the relief you are seeking [23-10099] (LEF) [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 11 LETTER OF ADVISEMENT. Reason: advising we are unable to determine the relief you re seeking [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 04/25/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 UPDATED CASE PROCESSING NOTICE sent. [23-10099] (RAJ) [Entered: 04/17/2023 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because the motion is premature [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie for release pending appeal [7]. [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 03/07/2023 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Correspondence received from Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie because we are unable to determine the relief you are seeking [23-10099] (MRW) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee or motion for IFP in DC due on 04/03/2023 for Appellant Kevin Neal Glaspie [23-10099] (LEF) [Entered: 02/07/2023 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin Neal Glaspie [23-10099] (RAJ) [Entered: 01/31/2023 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
