Marcus PayneIn re: Marcus Payne
In re: Marcus Jarrod Payne |
23-10259 |
March 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. [23-10259] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:53 PM] |
Filing 5 EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT of Petition for writ of mandamus [ # 2 ] filed by Petitioner Mr. Marcus Jarrod Payne [23-10259] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:53 PM] |
Filing 3 MOTION filed by Petitioner Mr. Marcus Jarrod Payne to proceed in forma pauperis [3] Fee deadline canceled. [23-10259] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:44 PM] |
Filing 2 PETITION filed by Petitioner Mr. Marcus Jarrod Payne for writ of mandamus [2] Date received in 5th Circuit: 03/14/2023. Fee due on 04/13/2023 for Petitioner Marcus Jarrod Payne. Sufficient Mtn/Resp/Reply due on 04/13/2023 for Petitioner Marcus Jarrod Payne. Document is insufficient for the following reasons: dc judge not served [23-10259] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:42 PM] |
Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING CASE docketed. [23-10259] (MRW) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Marcus PayneIn re: Marcus Payne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Marcus Jarrod Payne | |
Represented By: | Marcus Jarrod Payne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.