Searcy v. Progressive
Plaintiff / Appellant: Candace Searcy
Defendant / Appellee: Progressive Insurance
Case Number: 23-10422
Filed: April 26, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 25, 2024 Searcy v. Progressive

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2023 Filing 20 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-2803. Electronic ROA due on 06/21/2023. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/06/2023 11:31 AM]
June 6, 2023 Filing 19 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the photo sent via email because it is not accepted by the Court [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/06/2023 11:28 AM]
June 6, 2023 Filing 18 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy [ # 10 ] [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/06/2023 11:21 AM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 13 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/10/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:05 PM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy advising transcript unnecessary as it is already filed. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/02/2023 02:36 PM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy to proceed in forma pauperis [14]. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:07 PM]
May 22, 2023 Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT OF FINANCIAL STATUS filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy in support of the Motion to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy in 23-10422 [ # 14 ].. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:10 PM]
May 19, 2023 Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Burgess Wagstaff for Appellee Progressive Insurance in 23-10422 [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 05/19/2023 10:59 AM]
May 16, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [10]. [23-10422] (MFY) [Entered: 05/30/2023 11:52 AM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Robert Burgess Wagstaff for Appellee Progressive Insurance in 23-10422 [23-10422] (PAC) [Entered: 05/09/2023 01:44 PM]
May 2, 2023 Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Robert Burgess Wagstaff for Progressive Insurance for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10422] (Robert Burgess Wagstaff ) [Entered: 05/02/2023 09:05 AM]
May 2, 2023 Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. IFP pending in DC. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [23-10422] (PAC) [Entered: 05/02/2023 08:14 AM]
April 26, 2023 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Candace Searcy [23-10422] (MBC) [Entered: 04/26/2023 02:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Searcy v. Progressive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Candace Searcy
Represented By: Candace Searcy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Progressive Insurance
Represented By: Robert Burgess Wagstaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?