Harris v. Amazon.com
Chad R. Harris |
Amazon.com, Incorporated |
23-10556 |
May 26, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 BRIEFING RESUMED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 08/29/2023 for Appellant Chad R. Harris. [23-10556] (CAS) [Entered: 07/20/2023 01:37 PM] |
Filing 27 COURT ORDER denying Motion to stay further proceedings in this court filed by Appellant Mr. Chad R. Harris. (IN DETAIL) [ # 14 ] [23-10556] (CAS) [Entered: 07/20/2023 01:29 PM] |
Filing 21 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to suspend briefing notice filed by Appellant Mr. Chad R. Harris [ # 16 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline canceled [23-10556] (CAS) [Entered: 07/18/2023 08:10 AM] |
Filing 16 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chad R. Harris to suspend briefing notice dated 06/12/2023 [16]. Date of service: 07/14/2023 [23-10556] (CAS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 02:09 PM] |
Filing 14 OPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Chad R. Harris to stay further proceedings in this court. Reason: pending mandate in case No. 21-10133 and Supreme Court case No. 22-193. Date of service: 07/11/2023 [23-10556] (CAS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Andrew Barber for party(s) Appellee Amazon.com, Incorporated, in case 23-10556 [23-10556] (PAC) [Entered: 06/14/2023 03:36 PM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Nehal Anand for Appellee Amazon.com, Incorporated in 23-10556 [23-10556] (PAC) [Entered: 06/14/2023 03:35 PM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-10556] (Andrew Barber ) [Entered: 06/14/2023 12:00 PM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mrs. Nehal Anand for Amazon.com, Incorporated for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10556] (Nehal Anand ) [Entered: 06/14/2023 11:56 AM] |
Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 07/24/2023 for Appellant Chad R. Harris. [23-10556] (DDL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 02:32 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-10556] (DDL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 02:31 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-2279. Electronic ROA due on 06/15/2023. [23-10556] (RSM) [Entered: 05/31/2023 01:56 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-10556] (RSM) [Entered: 05/31/2023 01:54 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Chad R. Harris [23-10556] (AS) [Entered: 05/26/2023 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Harris v. Amazon.com | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Chad R. Harris | |
Represented By: | Chad R. Harris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Amazon.com, Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Nehal Anand |
Represented By: | Matthew Swanger |
Represented By: | Andrew Barber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.