Kelly v. Caudillo
| Jacob James Kelly |
| Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker, Charles Miller, III, FNU LNU, One Unknown OIG Investigator, FNU Vasquez, Captain, FNU Garces and Eight Unknown TDCJ-CID Officers |
| 23-10572 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob James Kelly [ # 9 ] [23-10572] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob James Kelly to dismiss appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42 [9]. [23-10572] (MRW) [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/13/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. Jacob James Kelly because appeal is not taken in good faith - fee assessed - BAUGH case.Fee due or motion for IFP in 5CCA on 07/24/2023 for Appellant Jacob James Kelly [23-10572] (MFY) [Entered: 06/23/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Christopher Lee Lindsey for Appellee FNU Vasquez in 23-10572 [23-10572] (PAC) [Entered: 06/08/2023 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10572] (Christopher Lee Lindsey ) [Entered: 06/05/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Review after Fee Issue is Resolved (PLRA case). [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [23-10572] (CAS) [Entered: 06/05/2023 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jacob James Kelly [23-10572] (AS) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
