Escobedo v. Lumpkin
| Jereme Lee Escobedo |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 23-10573 |
| June 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to comply with COA requirements filed by Appellant Mr. Jereme Lee Escobedo [ # 12 ] Motion due deadline updated to 08/30/2023 for Appellant Jereme Lee Escobedo. Brief in Support deadline updated to 08/30/2023 for Appellant Jereme Lee Escobedo [23-10573] (MRW) [Entered: 07/28/2023 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Jereme Lee Escobedo to extend time to comply with COA requirements until 08/30/2023 [12]. [23-10573] (MRW) [Entered: 07/28/2023 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-10573] (DDL) [Entered: 06/21/2023 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 2:21-CV-70. Electronic ROA due on 07/05/2023. [23-10573] (MVM) [Entered: 06/20/2023 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 9 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 07/31/2023 for Appellant Jereme Lee Escobedo. Brief in Support due on 07/31/2023 for Appellant Jereme Lee Escobedo [23-10573] (MVM) [Entered: 06/20/2023 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 06/07/2023 denying COA for Appellant Mr. Jereme Lee Escobedo [23-10573] (MVM) [Entered: 06/20/2023 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Stephanie Wawrzynski for Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division in 23-10573 [23-10573] (MVM) [Entered: 06/12/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM received from Ms. Stephanie Wawrzynski for Mr. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10573] (Stephanie Wawrzynski ) [Entered: 06/07/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. [23-10573] (MVM) [Entered: 06/05/2023 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Jereme Lee Escobedo [23-10573] (CAS) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:58 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Escobedo v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Jereme Lee Escobedo | |
| Represented By: | Jereme Lee Escobedo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Wawrzynski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
