Davis v. Lumpkin
Petitioner / Appellant: George Ray Davis
Respondent / Appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Case Number: 23-10693
Filed: June 30, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 15, 2023 Davis v. Lumpkin

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2023 Filing 14 LETTER REISSUED due to Address Change.A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 10/02/2023 for Appellant George Ray Davis [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 08/21/2023 03:08 PM]
August 17, 2023 Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-10693] (MRW) [Entered: 08/17/2023 04:22 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 12 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the Supplemental Appendix in Support of Brief for Appellant received from Appellant Mr. George Ray Davis because at this time we do not have a brief on filed. In accordance with the clerk's notice of August 4, 2023 the brief is due September 28, 2023 [23-10693] (MRW) [Entered: 08/11/2023 01:26 PM]
August 4, 2023 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-60. Electronic ROA due on 08/21/2023. [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 08/04/2023 08:14 AM]
August 4, 2023 Filing 10 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief due on 09/13/2023 for Appellant George Ray Davis.. Fee deadline updated to 09/28/2023 for Appellant George Ray Davis [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 08/04/2023 08:11 AM]
August 4, 2023 Filing 9 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/27/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Mr. George Ray Davis. [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 08/04/2023 08:10 AM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 8 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken at this time on the brief received from Appellant Mr. George Ray Davis because it was filed prematurely [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 07/19/2023 12:56 PM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 7 DISTRICT COURT NOTICE - IFP pending for Appellant Mr. George Ray Davis. Fee deadline satisfied. [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 07/19/2023 12:55 PM]
July 14, 2023 Filing 6 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [6] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 07/31/2023 for Appellant George Ray Davis [23-10693] (MVM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 07:58 AM]
June 30, 2023 Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. George Ray Davis [23-10693] (CAS) [Entered: 06/30/2023 01:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Davis v. Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: George Ray Davis
Represented By: George Ray Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Represented By: Susan San Miguel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?