USA v. Martinez
United States of America |
Ray Benjamin Martinez, also known as Ray Martinez, also known as Lukky, also known as Lukky Martinez |
23-10712 |
July 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 07/26/2023 for Appellant Ray Benjamin Martinez [23-10712] (AS) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:57 PM] |
Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Ray Benjamin Martinez [23-10712] (AS) [Entered: 07/11/2023 12:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Martinez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Brian W. McKay Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Ray Benjamin Martinez, also known as Ray Martinez, also known as Lukky, also known as Lukky Martinez | |
Represented By: | Rachel Maureen Taft |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.