Pipkins v. Grand Prairie Plce Dept
Joyce Pipkins |
Grand Prairie Police Department, NFN Patterson, Officer and David Hunter, Officer |
23-10721 |
July 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Pipkins v. Grand Prairie Plce Dept |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 09/18/2023 for Appellant Joyce Pipkins. [23-10721] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/08/2023 10:33 AM] |
Filing 9 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Joyce Pipkins to proceed in forma pauperis [9] Fee deadline canceled. Date of service: 08/07/2023 [23-10721] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/08/2023 10:27 AM] |
Filing 8 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 07/24/2023 denying IFP for Appellant Ms. Joyce Pipkins. Fee due on 09/05/2023 for Appellant Joyce Pipkins [23-10721] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/08/2023 10:15 AM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-10721] (DDL) [Entered: 08/03/2023 01:36 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-2879. Electronic ROA due on 08/01/2023. [23-10721] (RAJ) [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:28 AM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-10721] (RAJ) [Entered: 07/17/2023 11:22 AM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Joyce Pipkins [23-10721] (MVM) [Entered: 07/14/2023 12:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.