Thomas v. Dallas Indep Sch Dist
| Deborah Ann Thomas |
| Dallas Independent School District |
| 23-10882 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Jobs (Civil Rights) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Ms. Deborah Ann Thomas [ # 16 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 11/15/2023 for Appellant Deborah Ann Thomas [23-10882] (MVM) [Entered: 10/13/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 16 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Deborah Ann Thomas to extend time to file brief as appellant until 11/15/2023 [16]. [23-10882] (MVM) [Entered: 10/13/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 10/16/2023 for Appellant Deborah Ann Thomas. [23-10882] (DDL) [Entered: 09/05/2023 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-10882] (DDL) [Entered: 09/05/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Emily C. Adams for party(s) Appellee Dallas Independent School District, in case 23-10882 [23-10882] (PAC) [Entered: 09/01/2023 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Kathryn Elizabeth Long for party(s) Appellee Dallas Independent School District, in case 23-10882 [23-10882] (PAC) [Entered: 09/01/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-10882] (Emily C. Adams ) [Entered: 09/01/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Kenneth Adam Rothey for Appellee Dallas Independent School District in 23-10882 [23-10882] (PAC) [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-10882] (Kathryn Elizabeth Long ) [Entered: 09/01/2023 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Kenneth Adam Rothey for Dallas Independent School District for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10882] (Kenneth Adam Rothey ) [Entered: 09/01/2023 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 3:22-CV-2685. Electronic ROA due on 09/14/2023. [23-10882] (ABT) [Entered: 08/30/2023 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-10882] (ABT) [Entered: 08/30/2023 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Ms. Deborah Ann Thomas [23-10882] (RAJ) [Entered: 08/24/2023 04:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Dallas Indep Sch Dist | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Deborah Ann Thomas | |
| Represented By: | Deborah Ann Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Dallas Independent School District | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth Adam Rothey |
| Represented By: | Emily C. Adams |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Elizabeth Long |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
