USA v. Porter
United States of America |
John Edward Porter |
23-10943 |
September 12, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-10943] (Taylor Wills Edwards Brown ) [Entered: 09/13/2023 12:33 PM] |
Filing 3 JURISDICTIONAL REVIEW COMPLETE. Transcript order due on 09/27/2023 for Appellant John Edward Porter [23-10943] (TNM) [Entered: 09/12/2023 01:21 PM] |
Filing 1 DIRECT CRIMINAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. John Edward Porter [23-10943] (TNM) [Entered: 09/12/2023 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Porter | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Brian W. McKay Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: John Edward Porter | |
Represented By: | Christopher James Weinbel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.