Hallcy v. Hale Cty Cmsn
| Mark DeWayne Hallcy |
| Hale County Commissioners, David Mull, Hale County Sheriff, Wally Hatch, District Attorney, Danah Zirpoli, Assistant District Attorney, Jerry Mathews, Hale County Court Appointed Attorney and Robert Kinkaid, Jr., 64th District Court Judge |
| 23-10965 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 CLERK ORDER dismissing appeal pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 42 for failure to pay fee [12] [23-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 11 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [11] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 7 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed. [7] NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mark DeWayne Hallcy. [7] [23-10965] (AS) [Entered: 10/20/2023 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 IN ACCORDANCE WITH 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 42.3.1, the appeal is subject to dismissal in 15 days for failure to comply with the initial written deadline. Fee deadline updated to 11/01/2023 for Appellant Mark DeWayne Hallcy [23-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 10/17/2023 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied.. Fee due on 10/11/2023 for Appellant Mark DeWayne Hallcy [23-10965] (CAS) [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Mark DeWayne Hallcy [23-10965] (MFY) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
