Crotts v. Freedom Mortgage Corp
Alan Nelson Crotts |
Freedom Mortgage Corporation |
23-20028 |
January 27, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Foreclosure |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 CLERK ORDER granting Motion for leave for pro se to file electronically filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Nelson Crotts [ # 15 ] [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 03/03/2023 08:40 AM] |
Filing 17 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file appellant's brief filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Nelson Crotts [ # 14 ] A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 03/28/2023 for Appellant Alan Nelson Crotts [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:24 PM] |
Filing 15 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Nelson Crotts for leave to file electronically as a pro se party [15]. Date of service: 02/27/2023 [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:21 PM] |
Filing 14 UNOPPOSED MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Nelson Crotts to extend time to file brief as appellant until 03/28/2023 [14]. Date of service: 02/27/2023 [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 12 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Bradley James Conway for Appellee Freedom Mortgage Corporation in 23-20028 [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 02/13/2023 03:12 PM] |
Filing 11 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Dustin C. George for party(s) Appellee Freedom Mortgage Corporation, in case 23-20028 [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 02/13/2023 03:10 PM] |
Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Bradley James Conway for Freedom Mortgage Corporation for the court's review. Lead Counsel? No. [23-20028] (Bradley James Conway ) [Entered: 02/13/2023 09:42 AM] |
Filing 9 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20028] (Dustin C. George ) [Entered: 02/13/2023 09:39 AM] |
Filing 8 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 03/14/2023 for Appellant Alan Nelson Crotts. [23-20028] (DDL) [Entered: 02/02/2023 03:10 PM] |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20028] (DDL) [Entered: 02/02/2023 03:09 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:22-CV-1447. Electronic ROA due on 02/15/2023. [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 01/31/2023 04:20 PM] |
Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 01/31/2023 04:16 PM] |
Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Alan Nelson Crotts [23-20028] (CCR) [Entered: 01/27/2023 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Crotts v. Freedom Mortgage Corp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Alan Nelson Crotts | |
Represented By: | Alan Nelson Crotts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Freedom Mortgage Corporation | |
Represented By: | Bradley James Conway |
Represented By: | Dustin C. George |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.