Cox Operating v. Wells Fargo Bank
| Cox Operating, L.L.C. |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 23-20160 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Michael Terrell Murphy for party(s) Appellee Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., in case 23-20160. [23-20160] (RLL) [Entered: 05/23/2023 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20160] (Michael Terrell Murphy ) [Entered: 05/19/2023 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. SPECIAL ISSUES TO BE BRIEFED. A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/26/2023 for Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C.. [23-20160] (DDL) [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:21 AM] |
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20160] (DDL) [Entered: 05/17/2023 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Jack Thomas Jamison for Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. in 23-20160 [23-20160] (ABT) [Entered: 05/02/2023 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:19-CV-1889. Electronic ROA due on 05/16/2023. [23-20160] (ABT) [Entered: 05/01/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied [23-20160] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: TRANSCRIPT ORDER received from Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Date of Service: 04/28/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellant: Jamison; Attorney for Appellee: Mayes [23-20160] (Jack Thomas Jamison ) [Entered: 04/28/2023 07:02 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE FORM received from Mr. Jack Thomas Jamison for Cox Operating, L.L.C. for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20160] (Jack Thomas Jamison ) [Entered: 04/28/2023 06:53 PM] |
| Filing 9 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: OK to Process with Special Issues to be Briefed. [9] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/09/2023 for Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. [23-20160] (RLL) [Entered: 04/24/2023 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE CAPTION updated. Additional appeal filed 04/14/2023 dkt #208. [4] NOA filed by Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. [4] [23-20160] (RLL) [Entered: 04/19/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL DIVERSITY CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Cox Operating, L.L.C. [23-20160] (RLL) [Entered: 04/19/2023 08:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cox Operating v. Wells Fargo Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Cox Operating, L.L.C. | |
| Represented By: | Jack Thomas Jamison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Shannon Mayes |
| Represented By: | Michael Terrell Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
