DISH Network v. Elahmad
Dish Network, L.L.C. |
Bassam Elahmad, also known as Bassem El Ahmad, doing business as Elahmad.com |
23-20180 |
April 25, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
Copyright |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to extend time to file Appellant's brief, filed by Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. [ # 17 ]. A/Pet's Brief deadline updated to 07/05/2023, for Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 06/08/2023 02:57 PM] |
Filing 17 MOTION to extend time to file brief as Appellant until 07/05/2023 [17]. [23-20180] REVIEWED AND/OR EDITED - The original text prior to review appeared as follows: UNOPPOSED LEVEL 1 EXTENSION REQUESTED by Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. for filing Appellant Brief until 07/05/2023 [23-20180] (Timothy Frank ) [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:36 AM] |
Filing 16 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney Timothy Frank for Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. in 23-20180. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:37 PM] |
Filing 15 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED A/Pet's Brief Due on 06/20/2023 for Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C.. [23-20180] (DDL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 08:27 AM] |
Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20180] (DDL) [Entered: 05/09/2023 08:25 AM] |
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-581. Electronic ROA due on 05/24/2023. [23-20180] (NOTE: NDA was not sent to D.C. as the EROA has already been received) (DLJ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 08:21 AM] |
Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER received advising transcript unnecessary for appeal purposes. Transcript Order ddl satisfied. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/09/2023 08:19 AM] |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY TRANSCRIPT ORDER form filed by Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C.for the Court to process. Date of service: 05/08/2023 via email - Attorney for Appellants: Ferguson, Frank. [23-20180] (Timothy Frank ) [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:14 PM] |
Filing 9 Attorney Timothy Frank added as counsel of record for Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. in 23-20180. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/08/2023 12:32 PM] |
Filing 8 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20180] (Timothy Frank ) [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:31 PM] |
Filing 7 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [7] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Transcript order due on 05/12/2023, for Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/27/2023 12:17 PM] |
Filing 1 PRIVATE CIVIL FEDERAL CASE docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Dish Network, L.L.C. [23-20180] (DLJ) [Entered: 04/25/2023 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: DISH Network v. Elahmad | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Dish Network, L.L.C. | |
Represented By: | Stephen Matthew Ferguson |
Represented By: | Timothy Frank |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Bassam Elahmad, also known as Bassem El Ahmad, doing business as Elahmad.com | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.