Webb v. Lumpkin
| Everett Dale Webb |
| Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division |
| 23-20186 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus (Prisoner Petition) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL FILED. Admitted Exhibits on File in District Court? No. Video/Audio Exhibits on File in District Court? No State Court Papers included? Yes. Electronic ROA deadline satisfied. [23-20186] (DDL) [Entered: 06/16/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC RECORD ON APPEAL REQUESTED from District Court for 4:21-CV-30. Electronic ROA due on 06/20/2023. [23-20186] (RLL) [Entered: 06/02/2023 07:23 AM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER ISSUED. Motion for COA and brief in support are required. Motion due on 07/12/2023 for Appellant Everett Dale Webb. Brief in Support due on 07/12/2023 for Appellant Everett Dale Webb. [23-20186] (RLL) [Entered: 06/02/2023 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 DISTRICT COURT ORDER of 05/24/2023 granting IFP for Appellant Mr. Everett Dale Webb. [23-20186] (RLL) [Entered: 06/02/2023 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 10 DOCUMENT RECEIVED - NO ACTION TAKEN. No action will be taken on the Motion for Extension of Time to file COA/ notice of appeal received from Appellant Mr. Everett Dale Webb because there are no COA deadlines at this time as we await the district court's ruling on IFP. Any extension requests to file a notice of appeal must be filed with the district court [23-20186] (DLM) [Entered: 05/24/2023 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 FORWARDING MOTION for IFP received from Appellant Mr. Everett Dale Webb to the District Court for filing. Fee deadline canceled. [23-20186] (DLM) [Entered: 05/15/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE FORM FILED by Attorney(s) Sarah Miranda Harp for party(s) Appellee Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, in case 23-20186 [23-20186] (ABT) [Entered: 05/03/2023 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE FORM for the court's review. Lead Counsel? Yes. [23-20186] (Sarah Miranda Harp ) [Entered: 05/02/2023 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 5 INITIAL CASE CHECK by Attorney Advisor complete. Action: Case OK to Process. [5] Initial AA Check Due satisfied. Fee or Motion filed in District Court for leave to appeal in forma pauperis due on 05/17/2023, for Appellant Everett Dale Webb. [23-20186] (DLJ) [Entered: 05/02/2023 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CASE WITHOUT COUNSEL docketed. NOA filed by Appellant Mr. Everett Dale Webb [23-20186] (CCR) [Entered: 04/26/2023 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Webb v. Lumpkin | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Everett Dale Webb | |
| Represented By: | Everett Dale Webb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | |
| Represented By: | Edward Larry Marshall |
| Represented By: | Sarah Miranda Harp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
